In this article
Need a little support with this?
Rachel’s work is shame-free, direct, and grounded in therapy-informed tools for sex, relationships, and mental health.
Shame-free note: Use this article as a starting point, not a scorecard. Take what helps, leave what does not, and come back to the parts that deserve more care.
Most relationships run on autopilot. We assume we’re on the same page – about sex, texting exes, how often we talk during the day, what counts as cheating – until we realize we’re not. That’s what creating relationship agreements is all about.
The truth is, most people don’t create explicit agreements in their relationships. They rely on inherited scripts, cultural defaults, or vibes. But here’s the thing: assumptions leave a lot of room for disappointment, confusion, and avoidable conflict.
Relationship agreements aren’t just for non-monogamous folks, and they’re not about control, rigidity, or rules. Relationship agreements are about creating shared clarity on what matters, why it matters, and how to care for each other (and the relationship) intentionally.
In this blog, we’ll break down why agreements matter, what they actually are (and aren’t), how to create them, and how to revisit them as your relationship evolves.
Why Relationship Agreements Matter
Assumptions are often invisible until there is a rupture. And when they rupture, it can feel like betrayal, even when no one technically did anything “wrong.”
Assumed monogamy is a classic example. You may think texting an ex is harmless, while your partner might see it as a major breach. Neither of you is wrong; you just never made it explicit.
When couples avoid these conversations, they’re more likely to experience resentment, ruptures, and cycles of misunderstanding. Research consistently shows that it’s not the structure of a relationship that predicts satisfaction; it’s the quality of communication (Conley et al., 2013; Moors et al., 2014).
Relationship agreements are a form of proactive care. They help reduce ambiguity and build mutual trust. You don’t have to wait for a conflict to create clarity. You can do it together, on purpose.
What Relationship Agreements Actually Are (and Aren’t)
Relationship agreements are not:
- One–sided rules without the consent of both people
- Tests of love or loyalty
- Tools for control or surveillance
Agreements are:
- Co-created understandings
- Based on consent, not compliance
- Flexible, evolving, and open to revision
Relationship agreements reflect your shared values, not just behaviors. That might include:
- Sex and physical intimacy
- Emotional availability and communication
- Time, energy, and independence
- Digital boundaries (DMs, porn, texts)
- Relationship roles (emotional labor, care-giving, decision-making)
When agreements are explicit, both partners know what they’re building and how to show up for each other. This can help create emotional safety, a protective factor for long-term relationship satisfaction (Tatkin, 2012; Johnson, 2004).
How to Start the Conversation
If the idea of relationship agreements feels intimidating, start small. Remember, this isn’t a confrontation, but rather an invitation.
Try something like:
“I’ve been thinking about how we’ve never really defined some of the key things in our relationship, and I’d love to get on the same page about what feels good and clear for both of us.”
Here’s what a real conversation might sound like:
Alex:
“I’ve been reading about relationship agreements, and it got me thinking… There are a lot of things we’ve never really defined together. Like, what does commitment actually mean to us?”
Jordan:
“Isn’t that kind of obvious, though? We’re committed… we live together, we’re not seeing other people…”
Alex:
“Totally, and I’m not questioning that. But I think sometimes we assume things that feel obvious, until something comes up and we realize we had different interpretations. I’d rather get ahead of that stuff than wait until it becomes an issue.”
Jordan:
“Okay… like what kind of things?”
Alex:
“Like what counts as a boundary violation for us. Or how we both feel about emotional closeness with other people. Or what kind of check-ins we want when things get busy. We don’t need to decide everything right now, but I’d love to start talking about it together.”
Why this works:
- It’s inviting, not accusatory
- It names shared values (clarity, care)
- It allows space for reflection and collaboration
If your partner gets defensive:
“I’m not trying to change anything. I just want us to be clear on what we already expect from each other and make sure we both feel good about it.”
You can also use my AEO framework to set up and have this conversation. Check out the replay of that free workshop here.
Questions to Explore Together
- What does commitment mean to each of us?
- What behaviors would feel like a rupture?
- What assumptions are we carrying from family, past relationships, or culture?
- What agreements feel grounding rather than restricting?
- What expectations around time, communication, or independence do we have?
- What do we each need to feel safe, desired, and respected?
You don’t need to answer all of these in one sitting. Let it be a series of conversations, not a single summit.
When (and How) to Revisit Relationship Agreements
Relationships evolve, and so will your agreements. Just because something worked for you in year one doesn’t mean it works now.
Regular check-ins normalize change and maintain open communication. That could look like:
- A quarterly relationship review
- A post-conflict debrief
- A conversation after a big transition (new job, baby, move)
Red flags that it’s time to revisit agreements:
- One or both partners feel “off” but can’t name why
- Recurring arguments about the same themes
- Growing resentment or withdrawal
- A rupture around something
In non-monogamous relationships, ongoing consent and revisiting agreements are the norm, not a sign of failure. The same can apply to any relationship. According to Meg Barker (2005) and Lehmiller (2020), couples who co-create and renegotiate relationship terms report higher emotional resilience and satisfaction.
Common Pitfalls (and How to Avoid Them)
- One-sided creation: Agreements must be mutual. If one partner dominates, it’s not collaborative.
- Control in disguise: If agreements are used to police behavior rather than to create clarity, revisit the intention.
- Avoiding discomfort: Hard conversations are still worth having. Repetition builds fluency.
- One-and-done mindset: These talks should be ongoing, not a single milestone.
Relationship agreements aren’t about being perfect or prescriptive. They’re about being intentional and choosing each other with clarity, again and again.
Final Thoughts
Remember, this isn’t just for non-monogamous folks. It’s for anyone who wants to build a relationship that reflects the people in it, not just the scripts they inherited. And if you want support in creating agreements that feel good, fair, and flexible, I’d love to help.
Ready to create agreements that reflect who you are? Explore working with me or someone on my team.
If you want more writing like this, you can browse my posts on mental health and sex.
Related support
Explore Relationship Therapy or Polyamory & ENM Therapy, then use the inquiry form to find the right therapist or coach for your needs.
Want help applying this to your real life?
If this brought something up for you, you do not have to sort through it alone. Explore therapy, coaching, workshops, and learning options built around direct, inclusive, shame-free support.




